tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7126600816944475002024-03-13T10:15:23.937-07:00In the cosmic sand there are tiny diamonds...Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-58778843788802104282013-03-18T14:26:00.002-07:002013-03-18T14:26:29.505-07:00J.S. Mill on Why We Debate<em style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; line-height: 25px;">"However unwillingly a person who has a strong opinion may admit the possibility that his opinion may be false, he ought to be moved by the consideration that however true it may be, if it is not fully, frequently, and fearlessly discussed, it will be held as a dead dogma, not a living truth."</em>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-75837039742892471532012-11-14T14:22:00.002-08:002012-11-14T14:22:29.685-08:00Fall Reading ListThis is completely delayed, but better late than never...<br />
<br />
<br />
<ol>
<li>Equality and Partiality -- Thomas Nagel</li>
<li>Economix: How and Why Our Economy Works (And Doesn't Work) -- Michael Goodwin & Dan E. Burr</li>
<li>Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth -- Apostolos Doxiadis & Christos H. Papadimitriou & Alecos Papadatos & Annie Di Donna </li>
<li>Living High and Letting Die -- Peter Unger</li>
</ol>
<div>
My list is short this time around because I have been busy applying for graduate school. </div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-63645753701693334472012-03-19T22:01:00.001-07:002012-03-19T22:01:17.748-07:00Spring 2012 Reading List<ol>
<li>The Body Politic -- Jonathan D. Moreno</li>
<li>Bioethics -- edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller Jr., Jeffrey Paul* </li>
<li>Anti-Oedipus : Capitalism and Schizophrenia -- Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guitattari</li>
<li>A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia -- Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guitattari</li>
<li>Security, Territory, and Population -- Michel Foucault*</li>
<li>The Birth of Biopolitics -- Michael Foucault* </li>
<li>Anarchy, State, and Utopia -- Robert Nozick* </li>
<li>The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere -- Jurgen Habermas* </li>
<li>The Structure of Scientific Revolution -- Thomas Kuhn* </li>
<li>Power (an anthology) -- Michel Foucault* </li>
<li>Being and Time -- Martin Heidegger* </li>
<li>Being and Nothingness -- Jean-Paul Sartre * </li>
<li>Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington, and the Education of a President -- Ron Suskind* </li>
<li>My Life -- Bill Clinton* </li>
<li>? </li>
</ol>
* - Carried over from the WinterAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-60122768530430075342012-02-28T11:58:00.000-08:002012-02-28T11:58:22.638-08:00Nothing ever changes: In the past, Western society was ridden with religious wars between different sects of Christianity; now, Western Universities are ridden with religious wars between academic departments--primarily divided between science and the humanities.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-77888869080098083552012-02-22T12:48:00.000-08:002012-02-22T12:51:25.124-08:00A digital post-it noteIf the project of neurophilosophy is to bridge neuroscience with philosophy of mind, then I would like to propose that the project of neuroethics be to bridge behavioral psychology with moral philosophy.<br />
<br />
I need to do some research to see the extent to which any work has been done on any translational reductive projects that show how what we conceptualize as "moral rules" are just discrete habitual behaviors.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
"Ethics is a tool created, not given or discovered."<br />
<br />
http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2012/02/14/3430459.htmAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-309471269660887992012-02-11T15:26:00.001-08:002012-02-11T15:26:48.534-08:00All the world is a stage and I've grown tired of playing the villain--not to mention such a minor villain at that!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-40658572641203367582012-01-31T09:00:00.000-08:002012-02-28T11:58:45.091-08:00Winter Reading List<ol>
<li>Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance -- Robert Pirsig</li>
<li>The Master and Margarita -- Mikhail Bulgakov (re-read) </li>
<li>Exile and the Kingdom -- Albert Camus </li>
<li>Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World -- Haruki Murakami </li>
<li>Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature -- Richard Rorty (re-read)</li>
<li>Civilization and its Discontents -- Sigmund Freud (re-read) </li>
<li>Morality and Our Complicated Form of Life -- Peg O'Connor </li>
<li>American Nietzsche -- Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen </li>
<li>On What Matters -- Derek Parfit </li>
<li>Reasons and Persons -- Derek Parfit </li>
<li>Bioethics -- edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller Jr., Jeffrey Paul </li>
<li>Godel, Escher, Bach -- Douglas Hofstadter* </li>
<li>The Age of Spiritual Machines -- Ray Kurzweil* </li>
<li>Sister Citizen -- Melissa Harris Perry* </li>
<li>Anarchy, State, and Utopia -- Robert Nozick* </li>
<li>The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere -- Jurgen Habermas* </li>
<li>The Structure of Scientific Revolution -- Thomas Kuhn* </li>
<li>Security, Territory, and Population -- Michel Foucault</li>
<li>The Birth of Biopolitics -- Michael Foucault* </li>
<li>Power (an anthology) -- Michel Foucault* </li>
<li>Being and Time -- Martin Heidegger* </li>
<li>Being and Nothingness -- Jean-Paul Sartre * </li>
<li>Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington, and the Education of a President -- Ron Suskind* </li>
<li>My Life -- Bill Clinton* </li>
<li>? </li>
</ol>
* - Carried over from the FallAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-77412306969540895132011-11-14T14:03:00.001-08:002011-11-14T14:07:41.483-08:00The Prologue to Bertrand Russell's AutobiographyWhat I Have Lived For<br />
<br />
Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind. These passions, like great winds, have blown me hither and thither, in a wayward course, over a great ocean of anguish, reaching to the very verge of despair.<br />
<br />
I have sought love, first, because it brings ecstasy - ecstasy so great that I would often have sacrificed all the rest of life for a few hours of this joy. I have sought it, next, because it relieves loneliness--that terrible loneliness in which one shivering consciousness looks over the rim of the world into the cold unfathomable lifeless abyss. I have sought it finally, because in the union of love I have seen, in a mystic miniature, the prefiguring vision of the heaven that saints and poets have imagined. This is what I sought, and though it might seem too good for human life, this is what--at last--I have found.<br />
With equal passion I have sought knowledge. I have wished to understand the hearts of men. I have wished to know why the stars shine. And I have tried to apprehend the Pythagorean power by which number holds sway above the flux. A little of this, but not much, I have achieved.<br />
<br />
Love and knowledge, so far as they were possible, led upward toward the heavens. But always pity brought me back to earth. Echoes of cries of pain reverberate in my heart. Children in famine, victims tortured by oppressors, helpless old people a burden to their sons, and the whole world of loneliness, poverty, and pain make a mockery of what human life should be. I long to alleviate this evil, but I cannot, and I too suffer.<br />
<br />
This has been my life. I have found it worth living, and would gladly live it again if the chance were offered me.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-17342029105461019752011-09-06T12:10:00.000-07:002012-01-31T09:13:39.429-08:00Fall Reading List<ol>
<li>Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism -- Paul Boghossian</li>
<li>The Heart of Power: Health and Politics in the Oval Office -- David Blumenthal & James Morone</li>
<li>What Philosophers Know -- Gary Gutting </li>
<li>Godel, Escher, Bach -- Douglas Hofstadter</li>
<li>Godel's Proof -- Ernst Nagel & James Newman</li>
<li>Neurophilosophy -- Patricia Churchland</li>
<li>The Age of Spiritual Machines -- Ray Kurzweil</li>
<li>Sister Citizen -- Melissa Harris Perry</li>
<li>Darwin's Dangerous Idea -- Daniel C. Dennett*</li>
<li>Anarchy, State, and Utopia -- Robert Nozick*</li>
<li>The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere -- Jurgen Habermas*</li>
<li>The Structure of Scientific Revolution -- Thomas Kuhn*</li>
<li>The Birth of Biopolitics -- Michael Foucault*</li>
<li>Power (an anthology) -- Michel Foucault*</li>
<li>Being and Time -- Martin Heidegger</li>
<li>Being and Nothingness -- Jean-Paul Sartre </li>
<li>Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington, and the Education of a President -- Ron Suskind</li>
<li>My Life -- Bill Clinton</li>
<li>?</li>
</ol>
<div>
* - Carried over from the Summer</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-17507539424315173112011-08-11T18:22:00.000-07:002011-08-11T18:22:10.175-07:00On Parental LicensingWhy does the idea of parental licensing come off as so strange to people? Society has had a form of parental licensing in effect for a long time: the monogamous, heterosexual marriage.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-67400169803381185822011-08-10T11:55:00.000-07:002011-08-10T11:55:58.473-07:00non-sequiturWhy is it so wrong for a girl to be the big spoon and the guy to be the little spoon?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-50829207657542519742011-05-19T11:45:00.001-07:002011-05-19T11:45:59.414-07:00A Summer Missionhttp://www.refinery29.com/nyc-best-vegetarian-restaurants/slideshow#slide-8Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-53985381486307152752011-05-15T04:52:00.000-07:002011-07-25T15:59:10.591-07:00Summer Reading List<br />
<ol>
<li>Justice for Hedgehogs -- Ronald Dworkin</li>
<li>Darwin's Dangerous Idea -- Daniel C. Dennett</li>
<li>Anarchy, State, and Utopia -- Robert Nozick</li>
<li>The Structure of Scientific Revolution -- Thomas Kuhn</li>
<li>The Birth of Biopolitics -- Michael Foucault</li>
<li>The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere -- Jurgen Habermas</li>
<li>Infinite Jest -- David Foster Wallace</li>
<li>A People's History of the United States -- Howard Zinn</li>
<li>Money and Power -- William D. Cohan</li>
<li>Rise to Globalism -- Stephen E. Ambrose & Douglas G. Brinkley</li>
<li>Being and Time -- Martin Heideggar</li>
<li>Being and Nothingness -- Jean-Paul Sartre</li>
<li>Power (an anthology) -- Michel Foucault</li>
<li>House of Leaves --Mark Z. Danielewski</li>
<li>?</li>
</ol>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-55068778816294461612011-04-28T20:09:00.000-07:002011-04-28T20:09:11.222-07:00Global Internal Skepticism"It was one of those dewey, clear, starry nights, oppressing our spirit, crushing our pride, by the brilliant evidence of the awful loneliness, of the hopeless obscure insignificance of our globe lost in the splendid revelation of a glittering, soulless universe. I hate such skies."<br />
<br />
-Joseph Conrad, <i>Chance</i>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-30999482297801276512011-02-09T00:18:00.000-08:002011-02-09T00:23:36.923-08:00It is said that only dead fish swim with the current.This is floating around the internet, I stole it from a friend:<br />
<blockquote>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">"Most times than not, I just want to give up, say “fuck it” to the ideals I hold sacred, surrender to the harden of my heart, grow bitter and lose faith in humanity, but then I remember those same ideals. That honest enabling resiliency is strength and growth. That people and lovers will break your heart. That the world will throw stones of jagged and edge at you, that you must not fortify and throw them back but rather become river: let them skip, sink, weather for a while. For those stones will grow peaceful and smooth. Be stream, lay it at your slinger’s feet, show them that everything that toughens can be soft.</span> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">This is the challenge of being “human”. Never harden."</span></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">- Jorge Luis Brito</span></blockquote>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">Many people think that it is impossible for atheists to lead a moral life. There's an extent to which I might agree to this, but I know I am not conceding enough ground to satisfy those I speak of. </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">I always draw a distinction between an act that is moral and an act that is ethical. Acting morally requires that you align your actions with what is expected of you. The moral act is aligned with the accepted notions of right and wrong in your current society; it is contingent upon what is conventional. I take the shared etymological lineage of the words 'moral' and 'mores' to be indicative of this. </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">Acting ethically, on the other hand, requires only that your action be in alignment with what is right by you.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">The homosexual couple that gets married, for instance, may not be acting morally, since this type of marriage is frowned upon in most places, but I do believe they are acting ethically, since they probably feel that their love, and therefore their marriage, is justified. Though I don't believe they should need much justification, I like making the distinction between acting morally and acting ethically because it allows room for differentiating between actions that are socially approved and actions that are disapproved.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">I think that atheists are a little too prone to forgetting to think of the moral implications of their actions. Sure, they justify most of them ethically, but they forget to take their social environment into consideration, and thus act in ways that ultimately offend their neighbors.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;">This is not to say that societies should never question their values. In fact, as a philosopher, I make a living out of questioning what my society takes for granted. What I mean to emphasize is that no human being is an island, and as such there will always be a neighbor to cast judgment.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 16px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">For a religious person that believes in an omnipresent, omniscient deity, forgetting to relate yourself as an individual to your social environment is not so much a problem. Most likely, you are concerned with the way your actions will appear and be judged by your god. An atheist though, might easily forget to consider an objective perspective, especially one who is a product of a western society.</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">This is one way I think that atheists might fail to lead a moral life, though I would have to reiterate that the atheist is certainly leading an ethical life.</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">In the quote above, Brito's initial frustration could easily be the result of a conflict between his own personal ethics and his socially dictated morality. He has ideals that he holds sacred, but his commitment to them has lead to heartbreak and social stigma, which hurts like a rock. </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">But despite his frustration, Brito sees the value in "honest enabling resiliency." He recognizes that with patience, even "jagged edges" can grow "peaceful and smooth." Ultimately, by being a stream, one might "lay it at your slinger's feet"--teach the initial tormentor a lesson. </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">Yet, this exchange is hardly unilateral, for not only are the stones thrown into a stream made smooth by the current, but the stream is also added to by the sinking of the stones.</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;">Atheists may not have a god to look to for moral guidance, but they certainly are not lacking social connections. So long as society is willing to throw the rocks of moral judgment, then there will be ripples in the atheists' ethical stream. </span></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-39997329441049413502011-01-20T09:58:00.000-08:002011-02-08T23:20:23.526-08:00All the Small Things...Really, it's amazing how much replacing a lost iPod and supplementing it with a decent pair of headphones can do for your happiness.<br />
<br />
I'm sitting in my own musical world within the small empty world that is the philosophy lounge.<br />
<br />
I wonder if these will keep my ears warm too...Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-35844356336440133152010-12-25T13:30:00.000-08:002011-02-09T00:27:29.124-08:00Boulevard Davout, Paris-Christmas 2010, 22:28"Philosophy, paralysis, do they sound the same or is that just me?"Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-86234216663646802102010-12-20T10:19:00.001-08:002010-12-20T10:19:21.292-08:00<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">"The work of art is the object seen sub specie aeternitatis; and the good life is the world seen <i>sub specie aeternitatis</i>. This is the connection between art and ethics."</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">-Ludwig Wittgenstein, <i>Philosophical Investigations</i></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712660081694447500.post-81040441287276850602010-12-04T14:45:00.000-08:002011-08-07T17:16:40.036-07:00Angst and Moral CourageThe Hippocratic Oath is a tradition that physicians have participated in since the 5th Century B.C.E. Although no one version is referenced by all doctors, the same basic premise resounds throughout: medical doctors possess an obligation to act justly, whether they are alleviating the suffering of the sick, to the best of their ability, or simply remembering to respect the dignity of all persons, sick and well.<br />
<br />
A <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/dec/01/torture-george-bush">recent article</a> in <i>The Guardian </i>describes former-President George W. Bush's admission in his memoir, Decision Points, to allowing--or rather giving a "Damn right" to--the use of torture, including waterboarding, by the CIA. Bush's justification for this decision relied on the presence of doctors, who no doubt have taken some version of the above mentioned oath, during the procedures. In fact, according to Bush, the doctors gave their assurance that the procedures did no lasting harm.<br />
<br />
There is, however, something missing here. Since waterboarding and other forms of torture are illegal, there is a shortage of credible medical studies on the health effects to people undergoing them. It seems that the CIA under the Bush-Cheney administration took advantage of the opportunity the wars they started provided to conduct the studies themselves.<br />
<br />
The participation of the doctors in all of this goes against physician codes of ethics for several reason. It is unethical for a doctor to conduct a study on a human subject without the subject's permission. It is also a clear violation of basic human rights to participate in torture. That last reason is not something which is exclusive to medical doctors either.<br />
<br />
On a more fundamental level, there is also something a bit dubious about the studies. Doctors were brought in for torture procedures in order for them to make observations and calibrate the boundaries for where the procedures begin to produce "severe pain" in the prisoners. The production of "severe pain" is an important legal threshold, demarcating the difference between torture and non-torture. Yet a problem arises whenever a study requires an observer to make an objective quantitative assessment of the pain another party is subjectively experiencing. This is the same problem that arises when doctors are brought in to determine whether or not a patient's pain has become "unbearable", therefore making the patient a candidate for euthanasia in Denmark. <br />
<br />
As Keller and Allen put it in their article, "The circular reasoning of legally requiring medical participation in torture – and then arguing that this is what makes the torture legal – is palpable and brazen." Since the justification of the procedures is logically flawed, and the conductance of the studies is scientifically and morally flawed, the presence of doctors during torture procedures was unnecessary and grossly irreverent.<br />
<br />
I do not want to play the blame-game. While I do not doubt that there are doctors out there who would have voluntarily participated in this out of a skewed sense of patriotic duty, I also would not be surprised if any of the doctors that did this were coerced into participating, whether with threats of losing their job or the temptation of cash. I've been given the concept of moral courage much thought lately. I think that it is necessary present in large quantities in every great leader, but also must be a characteristic of every good citizen. Reading about the role doctors played during the CIA's torture of prisoners makes me realize that moral courage is not something people are born with. It is something that must be worked towards and requires a great deal of thought and reflection.<br />
<br />
I started this blog so that I may have a way to organize my thoughts, while I reflect on my own actions, in light of my future aspiration to be a physician, and the role moral courage plays in my decision-making. <br />
<br />
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01363272079611579264noreply@blogger.com0